El Paso campus announcement ↗
Original phase and subsequent expansion; not actual spending or audited employment.
Company announcement
EL PASOIN FOCUSOptional Google Analytics measures reading and navigation. No advertising or form contents. Your choice won’t affect access. Privacy details
81 sources, with dates and clear notes on what each can establish.
Source descriptions are provided in both languages. Original linked documents may be in English. A government or company statement establishes its author’s position; it is not automatically an independent finding.
81 sources
Original phase and subsequent expansion; not actual spending or audited employment.
Company announcementExpanded campus and job forecasts; peak construction differs from ongoing employment.
Company announcementOwnership, approximate development cost, financing, leases and guarantees; not complete bond documents.
Company transaction announcementNames Meta; approval sequence, zoning, incentive structure and historical estimates.
Council presentationTen-year abatement and definitions; later amendments not certified.
ContractGrant timing, conditions and remedies; use sections, not FAQ shorthand.
ContractSeparate road allocations; draft portions do not establish final executed terms or payments.
Mixed municipal packetQualifying purchases and eligibility; not all taxes waived.
Official program guidanceEntity roles may change; blank end date is not a listed 2045 expiration.
Official registerFiscal figures and incentive timing require cross-checks; conflicts documented.
Municipal explanationNew revenue projections and City legal assessment; not reconciled model or court judgment.
Municipal party statementFunding structure; requires district-specific application.
Official program guidanceRecent formula changes; not a calculation for YISD or the campus.
Official guidanceSocorro manufacturing forecasts; no demonstrated causal link to Meta campus.
Company announcementSection 5(a) and Exhibit B; executed status and later amendments not certified.
Agreement approval packetModeled usage and utility legal interpretation; not metered public data.
Utility explanationGeneral cooling principles; not El Paso engineering specification.
Technical guidanceGeneral design description; not verified local operating configuration.
Company technical explanationCooling design claims; not all operational water or El Paso deployment.
Company design announcementReplenishment goals and claims require location, timing and verification.
Company sustainability pageCurrent cost, capacity and future schedule; not operational supply.
Utility project pageHistorical aquifer evidence; not a campus-specific forecast.
Government scientific reportCity estimate and arguments; not regulator findings.
Municipal party statementBridge generation and future grid role; not approval or measured performance.
Vendor publicationAnnounced hearing and anticipated October/December schedule; latest docket not verified.
Municipal party statementPage 3 identifies tariff docket 59611 and intervention.
Official minutesSeparate rate matter; no docket number in release.
Municipal party statementWestern Interconnection planning context; plans are not completed infrastructure. Link updated to the official 2026 edition because the 2025 edition URL returns 404.
Utility planning reportUse section-specific jurisdiction; several large-load provisions expressly refer to ERCOT.
Enacted legislationERCOT interconnection audit; not statewide construction prohibition.
Executive announcementText not expressly ERCOT-only; enforceable El Paso implementation still requires records.
Company commitmentPollutant-specific regional status; not campus emissions or exposure.
Regulatory informationFour Phoenix-area facilities, limited traverses; full article not independently assessed.
Institutional record and abstract of journal articleRevised proposal and review; not final permit.
Company announcementProcurement and construction updates; future supply conditional.
Company announcementJupiter customer-delivery target 1H27; distinct from initial operation.
Company project pageEmployment, taxes and commitments are company-reported.
Company announcementArguments and prior scheduling history; does not establish that the court stay was lifted.
Litigating party statementFort Bliss selection and acreage; conditional project.
Government announcementHistorical comparative evidence; different market and fiscal arrangements.
Legislative research reportNo full independent methods/table review; not local forecast.
Working-paper abstract recordEmerging economic evidence; not peer-reviewed consensus or El Paso prediction.
Working-paper record55 proposed and approved tariffs; EPE Rate 50 concerns New Mexico.
Research reportPolicy adoption; implementing ordinances require separate verification.
Municipal action announcementFuture meeting at cutoff; no specific local fund allocation identified. Contains draft placeholders.
Advance council materialDescribes a temporary stay; not a final merits ruling or proof of the latest rescheduling. Direct reopening intermittently returned 403.
Congressional statementOracle's account of separate facilities and permitting status; not an independent county, court or environmental determination.
Company statementFuture program announced by Oracle; dashboard and assessments are promised after the data centers become operational, not current measurements or independent verification.
Company announcementReports the meeting outcome and next date; the county’s final appointment record was not independently located in the accessible official sources.
Local news reportRelays figures presented by Oracle representatives; not an audited employment report or independent count.
Local news report of public meetingRecord lists technical discussions and marks minutes final, but published minutes are unavailable; it does not establish an adopted community agreement or funding commitment.
Final meeting record and agenda listingDenies emergency petitions and lifts stays; does not decide the merits of the air permit or water authorization and does not set a new air-hearing date.
Supreme Court orderReports Meta's application opening and city discussion; does not establish an El Paso award, binding local-hiring term or adopted community agreement.
Local news reportThe agenda establishes that the item was scheduled; it does not by itself establish the vote outcome or the completeness of the appointments.
County agenda index linking the official recordReports the appointment outcome and pending first meeting; it does not establish that the committee has conducted independent monitoring or made regulatory decisions.
Local news reportAnnounces a planned fund administered by the foundation; it does not establish grants already awarded, a data-center operating result, or employment created.
Company and community-foundation announcementReports a notice to preserve Oracle's contractual position and possible payment deferral if the 2028 target is missed; the notice and underlying contracts were not publicly available for independent review, and this is not proof of a delay, default or cancellation.
Technology news report citing Bloomberg and company statementsNMED says the application is incomplete and will not advance until specified public-contact and stakeholder-record requirements are met; it is not a permit denial, court order or project cancellation.
State agency letterThe agenda authorizes submission of a request for up to $4 million; it does not establish a grant award, payment, or adopted community agreement. Minutes were draft and no result was available when checked.
City Council agendaDescribes staff proposals and a scheduled review; it does not establish approval, final rates, or a data-center-specific charge.
Utility noticeReports scenarios and requested community feedback; it does not establish an adopted budget, final rates, or a data-center-specific charge.
Utility reportNMED says the developer supplied a project contact but still must provide engagement records, meet with the Air Quality Bureau and submit a complete application; it is not a permit denial, court order or project cancellation.
State agency letterReports figures supplied by Oracle about workers and labor hours; it is not an audited employment report and does not establish local residency, permanent jobs, completed facilities or independent verification.
Company blogAppoints James O. Browning as hearing officer and identifies the department decision maker; it does not decide the permit merits or set a new public hearing date.
State agency orderConfirms the appointment and reports that a new hearing date had not been announced; it does not establish a permit approval, construction completion or operating facility.
Local news report referencing the NMED orderOffers up to $1 million in aggregate for proposed research; it does not establish selected researchers, installed carbon capture, emissions reductions, or a permit or operating facility.
Company research funding solicitationOracle and STACK said flooding reached the campus, no critical infrastructure was damaged, and the project remained on schedule; no independent engineering or government damage assessment was located.
Company statement distributed through public release serviceReports an unconfirmed possibility; it does not establish that Oracle will truck gas to Project Jupiter, that operations have begun, or that the project is delayed.
Trade-press reportConfirms rejection of a request involving a 0.6-mile portion of a proposed 17-mile pipeline; it does not establish that all alternative routes are unavailable, that the project is cancelled, or that trucked gas will be used.
State agency decisionOracle says it proposed an agreement for construction, commissioning and backup power, with $10 million annual minimum power spending for 10 years and a separate proposal for up to $55 million annually in New Mexico customer credits for three years; the agreements were not yet filed or approved in the checked record.
Company announcement describing proposed agreementsThe more than $13 billion impact, job counts, tax figures and emissions estimate are projections or company-reported results based partly on information supplied by Oracle and STACK; they are not independent operating measurements or guarantees.
Company announcement based on commissioned Mangum Economics analysisOracle announced a $1 million commitment for flood recovery; the release does not by itself establish disbursement, recipient contracts, project completion or independent assessment of the campus flood impacts.
Company announcementThe report says NMDOJ analyzed 17,419 comments, identified patterns involving form letters, internet addresses and comments bearing officials’ names, and asked NMED to preserve records and consider unverified comments or reopening the period if records cannot be verified. The investigation is ongoing; this does not identify responsibility for a particular comment, establish criminal conduct, or decide the air permit. The underlying AG letter was not directly located in the NMDOJ public press-release index during this check.
News report describing an attorney general letter and NMED responseReports estimates and expert analysis, including projected emissions for Meta and Project Jupiter; it does not establish measured operating emissions, a final Project Jupiter permit, or Fort Bliss construction or operation. The report’s underlying regulatory records and calculations should be treated as attributed evidence rather than independent measurements.
Co-published investigative reportThe orders schedule a contested permit hearing and related motions; they do not establish permit approval, construction completion or an operating facility. The linked PDF records were not directly rendered by the web reader during this check.
Agency docket documents reported by local nonprofit newsroomReports that more than 4,000 workers were on site, that closed-loop cooling was shown, and that new modeling requested by NMED showed higher pollutant concentrations than earlier developer modeling. These are reported observations and attributed modeling results, not independent operating-emissions measurements, a final permit, or proof of completed operations.
Local news report describing a company media tour and agency-requested modelingOracle describes a proposed private microgrid using solid-oxide fuel cells, up to 2.45 GW of installed capacity, expected lower NOx and negligible water use, and no customer funding of new public-grid infrastructure. These are company descriptions and expectations, not regulatory approval, independent measurements, or proof of operation.
Company blog postOracle reports more than $994 million awarded to 30 New Mexico firms, $160 million paid, 1,230 New Mexico residents who worked on the project and 630 from Doña Ana County. These are company-reported figures, not an independent audit; the release says projections assume air-permit and pipeline approval and does not establish an operating facility.
Company press releaseThe orders schedule a contested hearing for Dec. 7, 2026, reserve the first day for public comment, and set related filing dates; they do not approve the air permit, establish construction completion or show an operating facility. The supplemental order is linked from the same docket record.
Official administrative docket ordersThe page lists an administrative-record part 4 marked as of Oct. 27, 2026. The listing establishes a procedural docket update only; it does not disclose the contents’ merits, approve the air permit, establish completed construction or show an operating facility.
Official agency docket indexKRWG reports a unanimous authorization to provide notice of a potential breach concerning the proposed power-generation plant. The county did not publicly provide additional details; the action does not itself establish a breach, approve an amendment, revoke the IRB authorization or show that the proposed utility connection is operating.
Local public-media report describing a county commission action and attributed agreement languageTry a broader term or choose all source types.